top of page

The Most Dangerous Phrase in Kamloops Politics

Writer: Chris Mitra
Chris Mitra
Jun 22
4 min read
This image was generated with the help of AI. Don't panic... It's pretty common
This image was generated with the help of AI. Don't panic... It's pretty common

If you want to watch a local politician completely check out of their job description in real-time, just bring up the current state of our streets, property crime, or open disorder.

Within thirty seconds, they will invariably look at you with a sympathetic, practiced shrug and drop the ultimate political shield:

“Well, you have to understand… every city is dealing with the exact same problems right now.”

It sounds so reasonable. It sounds global. It sounds sophisticated.

It is also the single most dangerous, defeatist phrase in Kamloops politics.

When an elected official tells you “every city has this,” what they are actually saying is: “Hey, don't blame us. We’ve tried nothing, we are entirely out of ideas, and we’d appreciate it if you’d lower your expectations so we can get back to our expensive committee meetings.”

It treats community decline like bad winter weather—as if open drug use, rampant vandalism, and shattered storefronts are just seasonal acts of God that we are collectively forced to live with.

I spent 20 years in corporate tech boardrooms and C-level roles before becoming an executive coach. If I ever walked into a meeting with my stakeholders and said, “Yeah, our core systems are crashing, our security has been breached, and our assets are bleeding cash—but hey, our competitors are failing too, so let's just normalize it,” I would have been fired before the coffee got cold.

In the business world, you don't get to manage a crisis by pointing at someone else's disaster. You isolate the bug, you deploy a patch, and you fix the system.

Shifting from "Every City" to Executive Action

When a local shop window gets smashed on Tranquille or downtown, the owner doesn't care if it's happening in Seattle, Vancouver, or Nottingham. They care that it's happening to their livelihood right here in Kamloops.

The data tells us exactly how expensive these political shrugs have become. The Kamloops & District Chamber of Commerce and our local BIAs recently revealed that Kamloops small businesses absorbed an estimated $1.2 million in losses from crime and vandalism in a single year—a staggering 28% spike.

But the most heartbreaking metric in that report wasn't the dollar figure; it was the massive rise in "fatigue and normalization". Hard-working citizens are simply stopping reporting property crime because they feel the system has abandoned them.

That is what happens when leadership hides behind global trends. We anchor Kamloops to the worst-performing communities in the country instead of fighting to be the absolute best.

Proof That the Sandbox Boundaries are Fake

The history of successful municipal government proves that when local leaders reject passive excuses and try innovative strategies, things change rapidly. Cities do not have to wait for federal or provincial permission to reclaim their public spaces. Look at what happens when you actually think outside the traditional municipal bureaucracy:

Albuquerque’s "There’s a Better Way"

Faced with chronic panhandling, street inertia, and encampments, the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico, didn't just hand out useless tickets or write angry letters to higher levels of government. In 2015, they launched a program where the city bought passenger vans, drove directly to hot spots, and offered folks standing on corners above-minimum-wage day-labour jobs cleaning up public spaces, clearing trash, and pulling weeds. It broke the daily cycle of street disruption, gave individuals immediate dignity and cash, and led to the complete revitalization of over 400 city blocks. They used the basic public works frameworks they already owned to change the environment.

Real-Time Evidence Hubs

Municipalities across North America grew tired of watching the police arrest the same prolific property offenders, only to see them released hours later because of a lack of immediately available court evidence. Cities like Detroit and Atlanta stopped waiting for the judicial system to magically fix itself. They funded integrated camera networks (Real-Time Crime Centres) in property-crime hot spots. When a business was broken into, the tech allowed them to hand law enforcement an ironclad, unarguable video package the exact moment the suspect was detained. It systematically ended the evidentiary loopholes, giving prosecutors exactly what they needed to secure immediate jail time for repeat offenders.

Rewriting the Playbook for Kamloops

We don't need a single politician to wave a magic wand, and we certainly don't need another four years of gridlock or politicians acting like a one-man show. Municipal governance is a team sport.

But being a team player doesn't mean showing up to the game without a playbook.

True collaboration starts when someone brings a concrete, legally grounded strategy to the table that a majority of council can actually rally around. The tools aren't missing in Kamloops; the entrepreneurial spirit to activate them is.

We already have local bylaws on the books—like Good Neighbour Bylaw No. 49-1—that give the city broad powers to inspect properties, mandate compliance, and bill negligent facility operators for full cost recovery directly on their tax rolls. We already have complete control over local land-use permits, meaning we can pre-zone and clear municipal land for regional secure treatment centers tomorrow, stripping higher levels of government of any excuses to delay funding medical beds. And we have access to massive external capital pools—like provincial Civil Forfeiture grants and federal resilience funds—if we have leaders who actually know how to write competitive business cases to claw back our tax dollars.

The phrase “every city has the same problems” isn't an observation. It’s an abdication of duty.

This October, Kamloops has a choice to make. We can choose another term of sympathetic shrugs, bureaucratic stagnation, and normalized decline. Or we can adopt a growth mindset that looks at our local bylaws, our land, and our budget and says, “We are taking control of our own community.”

Let’s stop making excuses for the state of our streets. Let’s lead with intent.

If you want to see the specific, line-by-line legislative playbook I’ve engineered to tackle these issues on Day One, you can read the full Safe Streets & Clean Neighbourhoods Plan here.

LEAD WITH INTENT • RECLAIM KAMLOOPS

Election Day: October 17, 2026 | Kamloops, British Columbia


Authorized by the Christopher Mitra Campaign Financial Agent.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page